1
00:00:07.541 --> 00:00:09.050
Hello, it’s Yehwa

2
00:00:09.050 --> 00:00:11.101
Today, among the new Apple products

3
00:00:11.101 --> 00:00:12.744
I didn't expect too much...

4
00:00:12.744 --> 00:00:14.720
But when it was released, it became hot

5
00:00:14.720 --> 00:00:17.240
I brought AirPods 4 ANC

6
00:00:17.240 --> 00:00:20.719
Noise cancellation is usually emphasized in kernel-type earphones, right?

7
00:00:20.719 --> 00:00:24.420
(Open Noise Cancellation? Why bother?)
There aren't many people who expect that from open earphones

8
00:00:24.420 --> 00:00:27.840
Samsung released Buds3 after Buds Live

9
00:00:27.840 --> 00:00:31.200
(Apple's first open ANC earphone airPod 4 ANC)
This time, Apple released the AirPods 4 ANC version

10
00:00:31.200 --> 00:00:34.320
Tada! I'm going to compare the noise cancellation levels of the two earphones

11
00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:37.480
The price difference between the two earphones is around $75

12
00:00:37.480 --> 00:00:40.880
(About $75 difference)
Aren't you curious if there will be that much difference in performance?

13
00:00:40.880 --> 00:00:42.539
What's different compared to the previous one

14
00:00:42.540 --> 00:00:44.760
Noise cancelling performance compared to Buds3

15
00:00:44.760 --> 00:00:46.580
And if you're curious about the fit

16
00:00:46.580 --> 00:00:47.980
Please stay with us until the end of the video!

17
00:00:51.788 --> 00:00:52.988
(all_it studio)

18
00:00:52.988 --> 00:00:55.339
AirPods 4 have been released in two versions

19
00:00:55.340 --> 00:00:56.900
the regular models and noise cancellation models

20
00:00:56.900 --> 00:00:59.000
The price is $150 for a regular model

21
00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:02.020
The noise cancellation model I bought was about $190

22
00:01:02.021 --> 00:01:03.341
So $40 more expensive

23
00:01:03.341 --> 00:01:04.599
To tell you in advance

24
00:01:04.599 --> 00:01:06.693
(It's enough for $40)
I think it's worth $40

25
00:01:06.693 --> 00:01:08.020
As I will say again later

26
00:01:08.021 --> 00:01:09.221
Noise cancellation performance is good

27
00:01:09.221 --> 00:01:12.879
As for the specs, both models have H2 chips

28
00:01:12.879 --> 00:01:14.959
It's upgraded compared to the 3rd generation

29
00:01:14.959 --> 00:01:17.239
also bluetooth, from the previous version 5.0

30
00:01:17.239 --> 00:01:20.420
It supports Bluetooth 5.3 like AirPods Pro 2

31
00:01:20.420 --> 00:01:23.959
With the addition of dust resistance, it has improved to IP54 rating

32
00:01:23.959 --> 00:01:27.720
The case weighs 34.7 grams, lighter than the third generation

33
00:01:27.720 --> 00:01:31.559
2.4 grams heavier than the same generation

34
00:01:31.559 --> 00:01:35.839
Unlike regular models, what stands out is the built-in speaker at the bottom of the case

35
00:01:35.839 --> 00:01:39.760
There's a small ringtone when charging, 
and there's also a sound when looking for a location

36
00:01:39.760 --> 00:01:41.559
It's not a feature that I use often

37
00:01:41.559 --> 00:01:44.919
(Find My feature to be introduced in Korea in spring 2025)
It's planned to be introduced in spring 2025 in Korea

38
00:01:44.919 --> 00:01:45.959
which feels a little late

39
00:01:45.959 --> 00:01:47.800
So is Apple Intelligence

40
00:01:47.800 --> 00:01:49.519
(I'm losing my voice while waiting)
Why are there so many things to wait for?

41
00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:53.519
(Applied front hidden LED and deleted rear pairing button)
The difference in appearance is that the LED hole at the front of the case is gone

42
00:01:53.519 --> 00:01:55.440
The pairing button is gone

43
00:01:55.440 --> 00:01:57.760
(Pair with two touches)
It's changed to touch twice

44
00:01:57.760 --> 00:02:00.239
The exterior looks cleaner

45
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:04.000
(It feels kind of empty...)
It feels as empty as when the iPhone mute button disappeared

46
00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:05.639
You can charge it in type C

47
00:02:05.639 --> 00:02:07.480
Not only the Apple Watch charger

48
00:02:07.480 --> 00:02:10.720
It's possible if it's a QI-certified wireless charger

49
00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:14.440
(Magnetism weaker than previous products)
The case is small, so the magnetism is weak

50
00:02:14.440 --> 00:02:17.199
It's a small size, so it fits perfectly in jeans

51
00:02:17.199 --> 00:02:20.520
(It's a bummer that it doesn't have a crisp click)
It's a shame that the adherence has weakened

52
00:02:20.520 --> 00:02:22.440
There's little change in the weight of the earbuds

53
00:02:22.440 --> 00:02:24.759
The curve has changed a bit compared to the previous one

54
00:02:24.759 --> 00:02:28.160
The position and size of the sensors and grills are slightly different

55
00:02:28.160 --> 00:02:30.880
The angle of the head unit becomes sharper

56
00:02:30.880 --> 00:02:32.839
so it feels like it goes deep in your ears

57
00:02:32.839 --> 00:02:34.399
The bar got a little shorter!

58
00:02:34.399 --> 00:02:38.600
The second generation is  40.5mm, the third generation is 30.79mm

59
00:02:38.600 --> 00:02:41.839
and the fourth generation is 30.2mm
It's getting shorter

60
00:02:41.839 --> 00:02:45.320
Buds 3 made the bar that wasn't there in the previous one

61
00:02:45.320 --> 00:02:46.919
It's the longest one among these three

62
00:02:46.919 --> 00:02:50.440
Otherwise, AirPods feel like the bar is getting shorter

63
00:02:50.440 --> 00:02:51.919
(So ironic)
That's so ironic

64
00:02:51.919 --> 00:02:53.679
In addition, the AirPods 4 noise cancellation model

65
00:02:53.679 --> 00:02:56.399
has added head tracking control

66
00:02:56.399 --> 00:02:58.360
and conversation detection function on the AirPods Pro 2

67
00:02:58.360 --> 00:03:01.440
The earbud battery is 4 hours with noise cancellation on

68
00:03:01.440 --> 00:03:03.099
 and even with noise cancellation off

69
00:03:03.100 --> 00:03:05.560
it's 5 hours, 1 hour less than the previous one

70
00:03:05.560 --> 00:03:08.559
I admit that they added more functions compared to the previous one

71
00:03:08.559 --> 00:03:11.479
But I'm a little disappointed that the battery's performance has been downgraded

72
00:03:11.479 --> 00:03:13.619
I personally think it would have been better

73
00:03:13.619 --> 00:03:16.240
to leave out the head tracking function

74
00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:17.320
and increase the battery performance

75
00:03:17.320 --> 00:03:20.720
If you put it in a charger for 5 minutes and take it out, you can listen to it for an hour

76
00:03:20.720 --> 00:03:21.759
But you know

77
00:03:21.759 --> 00:03:24.639
When you take a long flight or when you go to and from work

78
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:27.119
you have to charge it, so if you take it out for a while

79
00:03:27.119 --> 00:03:28.360
it feels like it's breaking off

80
00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:29.919
I think this is a disadvantage

81
00:03:29.919 --> 00:03:32.880
Actually, the reason why there is a big difference in taste between kernel and open type is

82
00:03:32.880 --> 00:03:33.960
that there is a difference in fit

83
00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:36.320
I like the kernel type

84
00:03:36.320 --> 00:03:39.679
But sometimes when I feel tired in my ears, I also use the open type!

85
00:03:39.679 --> 00:03:41.479
I put on AirPods 4 now

86
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:43.679
and it feels small overall

87
00:03:43.679 --> 00:03:46.600
I think it's light and a bit loose

88
00:03:46.600 --> 00:03:49.080
Rather than putting it in, it feels like I'm putting them on?

89
00:03:49.080 --> 00:03:51.520
I'm going to wear AirPods 3 on the other side

90
00:03:51.520 --> 00:03:54.119
(Feels full and stable in the ears)
It definitely feels tight in my ears

91
00:03:54.119 --> 00:03:57.199
I feel like it won't come off easily compared to AirPods 4

92
00:03:57.199 --> 00:03:59.320
I like AirPods 4

93
00:03:59.320 --> 00:04:02.880
but if you have big ears, I think AirPods 3 will be better

94
00:04:02.880 --> 00:04:05.479
I'm going to try on the Buds 3 that I normally use!

95
00:04:05.479 --> 00:04:08.279
Rather than AirPods 4, it fits well for my ears

96
00:04:08.279 --> 00:04:11.000
(Convincing fit of bean sprouts)
This is the reason why the bar was added

97
00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:12.300
It's so stable

98
00:04:12.300 --> 00:04:15.199
But Buds Live really fell out of my ears

99
00:04:15.199 --> 00:04:18.720
But it's a bit strange because it's the same Apple product

100
00:04:18.720 --> 00:04:21.760
AirPods 3 and 4 have similar fit!

101
00:04:21.760 --> 00:04:25.359
I think I can group Buds 3 and Airpods 3 together

102
00:04:25.359 --> 00:04:28.760
to say they fit perfectly in your ears with perfect stability

103
00:04:28.760 --> 00:04:30.760
Though it may vary by person to person

104
00:04:30.760 --> 00:04:34.040
but I felt Airpods 3 fit perfectly to my ears

105
00:04:34.040 --> 00:04:36.720
then I would rate Buds 3 and Airpods 4 in that order

106
00:04:36.720 --> 00:04:38.920
I tried all these three products

107
00:04:38.920 --> 00:04:40.640
and cleaned the house and went running

108
00:04:40.640 --> 00:04:42.160
(All 3 products haven’t fell out from her ears!)
they never fell out from my ears

109
00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:44.279
so I wouldn’t worry about that issue

110
00:04:44.279 --> 00:04:47.040
If you have small ears or sensitive to pain

111
00:04:47.040 --> 00:04:49.559
I would recommend Airpods 4

112
00:04:49.559 --> 00:04:51.399
but if you want them to fit right to your ears

113
00:04:51.399 --> 00:04:53.679
with stability

114
00:04:53.679 --> 00:04:56.000
Buds 3 or Airpods 3 will be the right choice for you

115
00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:56.919
One thing I want to say is..

116
00:04:56.920 --> 00:05:01.079
(You’d expect to adjust volume on airpods, right?)
I thought I could adjust the volume on my Airpods 4 just like Buds 3

117
00:05:01.079 --> 00:05:01.920
but I couldn’t

118
00:05:01.920 --> 00:05:05.359
(Doesn’t matter if they’re newer and more expensive)
Airpods 4 are the newer version and is $75 more expensive

119
00:05:05.359 --> 00:05:07.600
(You can play, stop or change modes but not the volume(
You can touch them to play or stop

120
00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:10.440
but I couldn’t understand why you can’t adjust the volume

121
00:05:10.440 --> 00:05:12.920
I used this feature a lot

122
00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:15.559
when using my Airpods pro 2 and Buds 3

123
00:05:15.559 --> 00:05:16.559
I didn’t like that…

124
00:05:16.559 --> 00:05:17.920
Cutting to the chase!

125
00:05:17.921 --> 00:05:18.760
Noise cancellation

126
00:05:18.760 --> 00:05:21.519
(The opened shape doesn’t allow for full noise cancellation)
The kernel shape that allows for noise cancellation

127
00:05:21.519 --> 00:05:23.679
varies in their functionality

128
00:05:23.679 --> 00:05:25.399
So I didn't have high expectations

129
00:05:25.399 --> 00:05:28.920
It wouldn't make sense to compare these to Airpods pro 2

130
00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:31.720
So I tried Buds 3 one after each other

131
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.480
as they have the same opened shape noise cancellation feature

132
00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:37.359
But Airpods 4 has to be the best for noise cancellation

133
00:05:37.359 --> 00:05:40.920
(Just like the prototypical kernel noise cancellation earbuds!)
They felt like the early stage kernel type noise cancellation earbuds!

134
00:05:40.920 --> 00:05:45.760
In settings, there are four features: surrounding noise,  adaptability, noise cancellation and off

135
00:05:45.760 --> 00:05:47.640
If you turn on the noise cancellation

136
00:05:47.640 --> 00:05:50.279
it kinda feels like your ears are clogged

137
00:05:50.279 --> 00:05:52.799
Buds 3 don’t feel that clogged

138
00:05:52.799 --> 00:05:55.000
But Airpods 4 brought that back!

139
00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:58.040
The odd thing is, it seemed like 
they’re adjusting to the surrounding environment

140
00:05:58.040 --> 00:06:00.679
But it took a second of clogging then went back to normal

141
00:06:00.679 --> 00:06:03.679
This is opened feature so when you’re not listening to anything

142
00:06:03.679 --> 00:06:05.359
You can still hear the surrounding noise

143
00:06:05.359 --> 00:06:08.200
There was a big difference between playing music and video

144
00:06:08.200 --> 00:06:10.440
(Even if the volume is increased by 50%, speech is audible)
Buds 3 blocks wind noises

145
00:06:10.440 --> 00:06:12.600
But can’t block other noises completely

146
00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:16.640
I can hear the chats even when volume’s increased 50%

147
00:06:16.640 --> 00:06:19.679
(Below 20% of volume can block most notifications and chats)
But for Airpods 4, when the volume’s increased by 20%

148
00:06:19.679 --> 00:06:22.040
I couldn’t hear any alarms or chats!

149
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:24.880
(Buds 3 is newly developed with increased ANC feature)
Buds 3 was recently updated with firm ware

150
00:06:24.880 --> 00:06:26.760
which they claim the noise cancellation feature has enhanced

151
00:06:26.760 --> 00:06:29.799
(When it comes to noise cancellation, AirPods 4 wins)
I think AirPods 4 is better

152
00:06:29.799 --> 00:06:31.760
When noise cancellation function is on for both of the models

153
00:06:31.760 --> 00:06:34.880
I can hear others with Buds 3 on

154
00:06:34.880 --> 00:06:36.920
But with AirPods 4 on, I can hardly hear others

155
00:06:36.920 --> 00:06:39.799
(Possible to avoid mom's nagging)
With AirPods 4, you can avoid mom's nagging

156
00:06:39.799 --> 00:06:42.519
Of course, in an environment where a noise reaches a high level

157
00:06:42.519 --> 00:06:44.559
They both have almost the same functions

158
00:06:44.559 --> 00:06:47.160
(Subway Line 5, notorious for noise)
I was in the noisiest course of the Subway Line 5

159
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:49.839
To test the noise cancellation function

160
00:06:49.839 --> 00:06:50.959
It was a waste of time...

161
00:06:50.959 --> 00:06:53.559
It has 'Ambient' and 'Adaptative'

162
00:06:53.559 --> 00:06:55.799
I believe it's the only Open type model with those functions

163
00:06:55.799 --> 00:06:58.279
(AirPods PRO 2 has a better Adaptive function)
In my point of view, compared to PRO models

164
00:06:58.279 --> 00:07:00.160
It has an inferior Adaptive noise cancellation function

165
00:07:00.160 --> 00:07:02.359
But I am impressed by the Ambient function

166
00:07:02.359 --> 00:07:04.679
I could feel the amplifying sounds

167
00:07:04.679 --> 00:07:06.799
(Clearer surrounding sound than kernel type)
It has clearer sounds than kernel type

168
00:07:06.799 --> 00:07:08.320
Is it like cleaning out the ears?

169
00:07:08.320 --> 00:07:10.160
To recap the noise cancellation function

170
00:07:10.160 --> 00:07:13.880
I can dare to say it is the best of Open type earphones

171
00:07:13.880 --> 00:07:16.119
When it comes to sound quality

172
00:07:16.119 --> 00:07:19.920
It has been upgraded from H1 chipset to H2 chipset

173
00:07:19.920 --> 00:07:22.679
It has been equipped with acoustic architecture, low distortion driver

174
00:07:22.679 --> 00:07:24.880
And also dynamic range amp

175
00:07:24.880 --> 00:07:28.399
Especially, with the H2 chipset as in PRO 2

176
00:07:28.399 --> 00:07:31.320
I've expected this model to have improved sound

177
00:07:31.320 --> 00:07:34.480
Let me listen to music with noise cancellation off

178
00:07:34.480 --> 00:07:36.440
The song I chose is bass heavy

179
00:07:36.440 --> 00:07:39.100
808 bass is featured in the song

180
00:07:39.100 --> 00:07:42.279
I can hear the low notes clearly

181
00:07:42.279 --> 00:07:45.040
I think it has a smoother sound than Open type

182
00:07:45.040 --> 00:07:47.079
I listened next to a low-to-mid-pitched song

183
00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:49.519
It is a City pop by a female vocal

184
00:07:49.519 --> 00:07:53.119
(Background guitar sound is not irritating)
The constantly played guitar sound is not irritating

185
00:07:53.119 --> 00:07:55.640
I feel like the voice embraces me

186
00:07:55.640 --> 00:07:57.200
When listening to high-pitched songs

187
00:07:57.200 --> 00:07:59.920
The sounds is not shrill or crushed

188
00:07:59.920 --> 00:08:01.760
When Spatialize Stereo is off

189
00:08:01.760 --> 00:08:03.720
It has a much clearer sound

190
00:08:03.720 --> 00:08:07.320
If someone asks me whether this model has 
much more improved sound quality than the previous one

191
00:08:07.320 --> 00:08:08.839
I would say it doesn't

192
00:08:08.839 --> 00:08:11.519
This is because Open type, AirPods 3 has

193
00:08:11.519 --> 00:08:13.679
Great low sound quality

194
00:08:13.679 --> 00:08:14.920
And in general sound range

195
00:08:14.920 --> 00:08:17.480
It is said that it has a good resolution

196
00:08:17.480 --> 00:08:20.359
I've used it and Buds 3 in turn

197
00:08:20.359 --> 00:08:23.200
Compared to AirPods 4, it has 
weaker mid- and high-pitched sound

198
00:08:23.200 --> 00:08:26.279
But it has full low-pitched sound, 
which makes me think as if I'm wearing kernel type

199
00:08:26.279 --> 00:08:28.760
This is a typical comment

200
00:08:28.760 --> 00:08:30.920
When comparing AirPods and Buds

201
00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:33.719
I was curious whether noise cancellation (NC) affects sound quality

202
00:08:33.719 --> 00:08:35.039
So I tried listening with it on and off

203
00:08:35.039 --> 00:08:36.440
Personally

204
00:08:36.440 --> 00:08:39.799
I felt that with ANC on, it captured the sound better

205
00:08:39.799 --> 00:08:43.239
delivering a more concentrated bass

206
00:08:43.239 --> 00:08:45.760
With noise cancellation, the bass seemed more emphasized

207
00:08:45.760 --> 00:08:47.220
This could also be because the noise isolation allows

208
00:08:47.220 --> 00:08:49.579
for better focus

209
00:08:49.579 --> 00:08:52.520
Adaptive EQ is still there, like in the previous model

210
00:08:52.520 --> 00:08:54.359
and I used the default settings

211
00:08:54.359 --> 00:08:56.679
The main difference from Buds 3 is that

212
00:08:56.679 --> 00:08:58.180
while Buds 3 offers only basic audio settings

213
00:08:58.180 --> 00:09:00.979
in the wearable app

214
00:09:00.979 --> 00:09:04.359
AirPods allow more fine-tuning

215
00:09:04.359 --> 00:09:06.359
on Apple devices

216
00:09:06.359 --> 00:09:09.559
You can widen the frequency range, enhance mids and highs

217
00:09:09.599 --> 00:09:11.159
and use stereo spatialization

218
00:09:11.159 --> 00:09:13.440
to boost the lacking bass

219
00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:15.280
It’s noticeable enough

220
00:09:15.280 --> 00:09:17.559
so it might be a useful tip to keep in mind!

221
00:09:17.559 --> 00:09:19.799
To sum up, the sound quality of AirPods 4

222
00:09:19.799 --> 00:09:22.880
feels similar to, or slightly improved from the previous model

223
00:09:22.880 --> 00:09:24.599
Apple’s audio tuning capabilities

224
00:09:24.599 --> 00:09:26.960
and the focus brought by the noise-canceling feature

225
00:09:26.960 --> 00:09:28.679
were overall impressive

226
00:09:28.679 --> 00:09:34.400
However, Buds 3 supports SSC codec at 24bit/96kHz

227
00:09:34.400 --> 00:09:38.440
whereas AirPods 4 supports 16bit/48kHz

228
00:09:38.440 --> 00:09:39.840
which is a slight downside

229
00:09:39.840 --> 00:09:44.119
Considering Buds 3 is about $75 cheaper, 
it’s definitely a great option for the price

230
00:09:44.119 --> 00:09:46.640
AirPods offer good call quality

231
00:09:46.640 --> 00:09:48.320
even without being the Pro model—give it a listen!

232
00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:52.440
Also, in the 4th generation, 
like the Pro 2, the H2 chipset has been added

233
00:09:52.440 --> 00:09:55.200
and it includes a new voice isolation mode

234
00:09:55.200 --> 00:09:57.080
It's best to try it out yourself!

235
00:09:57.080 --> 00:09:59.239
I've tested it alongside Buds 3 too

236
00:09:59.239 --> 00:10:00.280
Let’s listen together!

237
00:10:00.280 --> 00:10:01.640
(House setting)
By the way

238
00:10:01.640 --> 00:10:03.679
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

239
00:10:03.679 --> 00:10:04.760
Please celebrate with me!

240
00:10:04.760 --> 00:10:06.159
(House separation setting)
By the way,

241
00:10:06.159 --> 00:10:08.280
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

242
00:10:08.280 --> 00:10:09.080
Please celebrate with me!

243
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:10.440
(House setting)
By the way

244
00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:12.440
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

245
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:13.400
Please celebrate with me!

246
00:10:13.400 --> 00:10:14.840
(Subway setting)
By the way

247
00:10:14.840 --> 00:10:16.760
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

248
00:10:16.760 --> 00:10:17.760
Please celebrate with me!

249
00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:19.280
(Subway separation setting)
By the way

250
00:10:19.280 --> 00:10:21.239
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

251
00:10:21.239 --> 00:10:22.479
Please celebrate with me!

252
00:10:22.479 --> 00:10:23.679
(Subway)
By the way

253
00:10:23.679 --> 00:10:25.599
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

254
00:10:25.599 --> 00:10:26.679
Please celebrate with me!

255
00:10:26.679 --> 00:10:28.080
(Standard street)
By the way

256
00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:30.000
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

257
00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:30.799
Please celebrate with me!

258
00:10:30.799 --> 00:10:32.159
(Street voice isolated)
By the way

259
00:10:32.159 --> 00:10:34.280
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

260
00:10:34.280 --> 00:10:35.159
Please celebrate with me!

261
00:10:35.159 --> 00:10:36.440
(Street)
By the way

262
00:10:36.559 --> 00:10:38.520
Did you know October 24 is my birthday?

263
00:10:38.520 --> 00:10:39.599
Please celebrate with me!

264
00:10:39.599 --> 00:10:43.039
I think the voice isolation is almost identical to PRO 2

265
00:10:43.039 --> 00:10:44.719
The sound isn’t nice

266
00:10:44.719 --> 00:10:45.919
Kind of mechanical

267
00:10:45.919 --> 00:10:48.239
Might be a lot after a while

268
00:10:48.239 --> 00:10:50.799
But I’m usually not on the phone for long

269
00:10:50.799 --> 00:10:52.520
(Accuracy over sound quality)
The sound transfers accurately

270
00:10:52.520 --> 00:10:54.239
So I appreciate the feature

271
00:10:54.239 --> 00:10:56.640
Buds 3 is like the in between

272
00:10:56.640 --> 00:10:59.440
of Airpods 4 standard and voice isolation

273
00:10:59.440 --> 00:11:01.479
You have an adequate voice register

274
00:11:01.479 --> 00:11:03.400
and the surrounding noises are well cut

275
00:11:03.400 --> 00:11:05.080
So it felt most comfortable

276
00:11:05.080 --> 00:11:07.840
So in terms of call quality I’d pick Buds 3

277
00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:10.320
and Airpods 4 for its isolation mode

278
00:11:13.880 --> 00:11:16.479
The open vs kernel depend on your taste

279
00:11:16.479 --> 00:11:18.119
but they can’t be compared

280
00:11:18.119 --> 00:11:20.081
Despite the stuffy wearing

281
00:11:20.081 --> 00:11:23.060
we use kernel earphones because of noise cancellation

282
00:11:23.060 --> 00:11:27.559
The perfect earphones would be 
the comfort of open type and quality of kernel type

283
00:11:27.559 --> 00:11:30.719
Like a hybrid car

284
00:11:30.719 --> 00:11:34.080
So it’s the first open type noise canceling earbuds

285
00:11:34.080 --> 00:11:36.659
(Good quality)
This quality is quite good

286
00:11:36.659 --> 00:11:38.159
Praise is due

287
00:11:38.159 --> 00:11:41.119
Choose your earphones depending on the environment

288
00:11:41.119 --> 00:11:44.279
But this does work well with Galaxy

289
00:11:44.280 --> 00:11:45.239
I would feel?

290
00:11:45.239 --> 00:11:48.400
(Battery length and touch volume adjustment are lacking)
Compared to Buds 3, battery life is shorter

291
00:11:48.400 --> 00:11:51.400
and volume control is missing

292
00:11:51.400 --> 00:11:54.159
If an open type noise cancellation is this good

293
00:11:54.159 --> 00:11:56.960
I’m looking forward to the Airpod Pro 3

294
00:11:56.960 --> 00:11:58.640
(all_it studio Subscribe & Like & Set on notification)
This is it for today

295
00:11:58.640 --> 00:12:00.280
If you have any questions

296
00:12:00.280 --> 00:12:01.640
Please leave a comment

297
00:12:01.640 --> 00:12:03.359
See you in the next video

298
00:12:03.359 --> 00:12:04.880
Bye