1
00:00:12.465 --> 00:00:13.800
Hello, I am Yehwa

2
00:00:13.800 --> 00:00:15.350
Today, I will introduce

3
00:00:15.350 --> 00:00:16.919
Samsung's Galaxy Buds 3 Pro

4
00:00:16.919 --> 00:00:19.589
which had a lot of people looking forward to it, but also a lot of issues as well

5
00:00:19.589 --> 00:00:21.298
I showed you a little bit

6
00:00:21.298 --> 00:00:22.880
on Samsung Creator Day last time

7
00:00:22.880 --> 00:00:24.942
I bought it right away

8
00:00:24.942 --> 00:00:27.119
But the QC issue happened after

9
00:00:27.119 --> 00:00:29.469
and the sale was temporarily suspended

10
00:00:29.470 --> 00:00:31.460
Did I get a good one?

11
00:00:31.460 --> 00:00:35.329
Design, sound quality, wearability, and newly added AI functions

12
00:00:35.329 --> 00:00:38.329
I will introduce in detail what I felt while using it for a month

13
00:00:38.329 --> 00:00:40.130
Please stay with us until the end of today's video

14
00:00:45.198 --> 00:00:47.520
There are two colors, silver and white

15
00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:49.749
The factory price is KRW 310,900

16
00:00:49.749 --> 00:00:50.769
It's a pro model

17
00:00:50.769 --> 00:00:53.720
but Buds has a bit of a cost-effective image

18
00:00:53.720 --> 00:00:56.978
So I felt awkward about the price of KRW 310,000

19
00:00:56.978 --> 00:01:00.522
But compared to AirPods Pro, this is KRW 40,000 cheaper

20
00:01:00.522 --> 00:01:03.520
If you look at it, I think Apple is really good at doing business

21
00:01:03.520 --> 00:01:06.150
I bought the white color

22
00:01:06.150 --> 00:01:09.239
I was a little worried because the defect rate of white model was high

23
00:01:09.239 --> 00:01:12.239
but fortunately, I got a good one

24
00:01:12.239 --> 00:01:13.638
This isn't even Tesla...

25
00:01:13.638 --> 00:01:15.510
Telling you the different specifications compared to the previous model

26
00:01:15.510 --> 00:01:18.549
Waterproofing has been upgraded from IPX7, which is water resistance in daily life

27
00:01:18.549 --> 00:01:22.819
to IP57 that can be used even if they sink into water

28
00:01:22.819 --> 00:01:25.338
But you still can't swim with it

29
00:01:25.338 --> 00:01:27.239
Does anyone have earphones for swimming?

30
00:01:27.239 --> 00:01:29.459
I want to dance while swimming

31
00:01:29.459 --> 00:01:32.549
The battery is 6 hours based on when the noise cancellation function is on

32
00:01:32.549 --> 00:01:36.079
You can use it for 26 hours with a charged case

33
00:01:36.079 --> 00:01:38.928
It didn't feel like the battery actually increased

34
00:01:38.928 --> 00:01:42.219
Since there's a setting for the amplifier or sound quality

35
00:01:42.219 --> 00:01:45.179
I think it was a little difficult to increase the battery life

36
00:01:45.179 --> 00:01:48.569
Let's take a look at the design

37
00:01:48.569 --> 00:01:49.689
My first impression of "Cradle(Case)" is

38
00:01:49.689 --> 00:01:52.839
It looks like the apple design that we know

39
00:01:52.839 --> 00:01:54.710
The difference is that the lid is transparent

40
00:01:54.710 --> 00:01:55.979
I was worried

41
00:01:55.979 --> 00:01:59.199
because the expected image said it was cheap plastic

42
00:01:59.199 --> 00:02:02.249
Personally, I like Buds' cradle better than AirPods'

43
00:02:02.249 --> 00:02:06.158
It's transparent, so if it gets scratches, it's easy to notice them

44
00:02:06.158 --> 00:02:08.057
I didn't wear a case

45
00:02:08.057 --> 00:02:09.789
but I didn't get any big scratches

46
00:02:09.789 --> 00:02:13.178
I bought AirPods Pro and didn't use them for a long time

47
00:02:13.178 --> 00:02:15.338
but I was upset because I saw a lot of scratches

48
00:02:15.338 --> 00:02:17.738
If you look inside the cradle, you can see a blue line on the left

49
00:02:17.738 --> 00:02:20.219
and an orange line on the right

50
00:02:20.219 --> 00:02:22.640
Doesn't it look like a water tap in a bathtub?

51
00:02:22.640 --> 00:02:24.949
Hot or cold? That kinda vibe?

52
00:02:24.949 --> 00:02:25.702
But guys

53
00:02:25.702 --> 00:02:27.039
There's a reason for this

54
00:02:27.039 --> 00:02:29.413
In audiology, when distinguishing left and right

55
00:02:29.413 --> 00:02:33.200
They use colors along with symbols for accuracy

56
00:02:33.200 --> 00:02:36.469
Blue means left, red means right

57
00:02:36.469 --> 00:02:38.765
This is used on hearing test headphone cables

58
00:02:38.765 --> 00:02:40.419
audiogram charts

59
00:02:40.419 --> 00:02:43.039
and hearing aids

60
00:02:43.039 --> 00:02:46.579
Maybe they're trying to look professional

61
00:02:46.579 --> 00:02:48.238
but honestly

62
00:02:48.238 --> 00:02:50.908
consumers don't care about this stuff

63
00:02:50.908 --> 00:02:53.098
Some say Blue's L for Left

64
00:02:53.098 --> 00:02:56.400
and Red's R for Right

65
00:02:56.400 --> 00:02:58.902
but "Orange" has an R too, so...

66
00:02:58.902 --> 00:02:59.978
Makes sense, I guess

67
00:02:59.978 --> 00:03:02.638
The earbuds have color bands on the bottom

68
00:03:02.638 --> 00:03:05.818
Unlike AirPods Pro, you don't just take them off and put them in

69
00:03:05.818 --> 00:03:08.028
You have to rotate them 180 degrees

70
00:03:08.028 --> 00:03:10.910
The triangular stem looks nice design wise

71
00:03:10.910 --> 00:03:13.239
but it's a pain to put it in and out of the case

72
00:03:13.239 --> 00:03:15.169
You get used to it though

73
00:03:15.169 --> 00:03:17.149
and eventually find the sweet spot

74
00:03:17.149 --> 00:03:19.560
With AirPods, I'd sometimes put them in without looking

75
00:03:19.560 --> 00:03:21.609
and put each of them in the wrong places

76
00:03:21.609 --> 00:03:23.439
But since this one has the colors marked

77
00:03:23.439 --> 00:03:24.759
I just put them in in their right places at once

78
00:03:24.759 --> 00:03:27.098
So I haven't put them in the wrong places yet

79
00:03:27.098 --> 00:03:29.370
The earbuds are canal(in-ear) type

80
00:03:29.370 --> 00:03:33.589
They've added a stem to the usual round shape

81
00:03:33.589 --> 00:03:36.330
giving it that "bean sprout" look

82
00:03:36.330 --> 00:03:40.379
The stem design has perks of housing mics and antennas

83
00:03:40.379 --> 00:03:43.340
for better sound pickup and connection

84
00:03:43.340 --> 00:03:46.759
and distributes weight to reduce ear fatigue

85
00:03:46.759 --> 00:03:48.449
These practical reasons

86
00:03:48.449 --> 00:03:50.969
probably outweighed

87
00:03:50.969 --> 00:03:53.138
the "AirPod copycat" criticism

88
00:03:53.138 --> 00:03:55.039
I think it was a good call

89
00:03:55.039 --> 00:03:56.998
Sure, they might get flak for copying

90
00:03:56.998 --> 00:03:59.198
but it genuinely improves the performance

91
00:03:59.198 --> 00:04:00.424
I really felt

92
00:04:00.424 --> 00:04:02.879
the advantages of the stem design while using them

93
00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:04.920
I'll explain more later

94
00:04:04.920 --> 00:04:08.089
To stand out from AirPods, they added

95
00:04:08.089 --> 00:04:10.008
this "blade light"

96
00:04:10.008 --> 00:04:14.840
They say it's for safety during night jogs

97
00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:16.427
But more than safety

98
00:04:16.427 --> 00:04:20.760
it seemed to be more about style

99
00:04:20.760 --> 00:04:22.480
Surprisingly, it's got some neat features

100
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:24.110
Recently, I...

101
00:04:24.110 --> 00:04:25.869
I went on a trip

102
00:04:25.869 --> 00:04:28.239
I was sleeping on the plane

103
00:04:28.239 --> 00:04:29.569
and I woke up and had dropped my Buds

104
00:04:29.569 --> 00:04:31.389
I looked for it for a second, but I couldn't find it

105
00:04:31.389 --> 00:04:33.249
so I use the function 'Find my earbuds'

106
00:04:33.249 --> 00:04:34.549
Then, it lit up

107
00:04:34.549 --> 00:04:36.930
and I noticed that they had fallen on the seat next to me

108
00:04:36.930 --> 00:04:41.629
I thought it would be useful when they fell under car seats

109
00:04:41.629 --> 00:04:42.989
that I can't see well even with the light on

110
00:04:42.989 --> 00:04:44.960
I've never left the light on

111
00:04:44.960 --> 00:04:47.030
because I thought I'd be an attention seeker

112
00:04:47.030 --> 00:04:49.119
I think it would be good to know

113
00:04:49.119 --> 00:04:50.468
that there are useful functions like this

114
00:04:50.468 --> 00:04:52.389
I'll show you how it looks when I wear it

115
00:04:52.389 --> 00:04:55.688
Doesn't it feel more sophisticated than AirPods?

116
00:04:55.688 --> 00:04:58.169
I think the stem plays the biggest role

117
00:04:58.169 --> 00:05:00.269
It's uncomfortable when you put it in and take it out

118
00:05:00.269 --> 00:05:02.699
but I think it was a good design detail

119
00:05:02.699 --> 00:05:04.689
It's not just once or twice

120
00:05:04.689 --> 00:05:07.079
that someone asked for my number while wearing it

121
00:05:07.079 --> 00:05:09.090
Maybe it's not because of the Buds

122
00:05:09.090 --> 00:05:11.389
And what I liked the most is

123
00:05:11.389 --> 00:05:12.888
this fit

124
00:05:12.888 --> 00:05:16.969
In the previous one, the body part was big, so it felt like it was put on top of the ears

125
00:05:16.969 --> 00:05:20.669
rather than the feeling that it fitting in perfectly

126
00:05:20.669 --> 00:05:23.618
But as the body got smaller, I could feel that they went right into my ears

127
00:05:23.618 --> 00:05:25.889
and the gaps got smaller

128
00:05:25.889 --> 00:05:28.767
It might be because the shape of my ears and the size of Buds' ear tips

129
00:05:28.767 --> 00:05:30.770
fit well with my ears

130
00:05:30.770 --> 00:05:34.180
but I didn't feel like they were pressing my ears

131
00:05:34.180 --> 00:05:36.158
In the case of this canal type

132
00:05:36.158 --> 00:05:38.638
if you wear it for a long time because of the sound insulation

133
00:05:38.638 --> 00:05:40.340
your ears will hurt no matter what

134
00:05:40.340 --> 00:05:41.578
What should I say

135
00:05:41.578 --> 00:05:44.979
It's a subtle fit between the canal type and the open type

136
00:05:44.979 --> 00:05:47.020
Compared to the previous one, it doesn't fall out that well

137
00:05:47.020 --> 00:05:49.379
I liked the fact that I dropped it less often

138
00:05:49.379 --> 00:05:51.188
And with the stem installed

139
00:05:51.188 --> 00:05:54.230
pinch control and swipe volume control are possible

140
00:05:54.230 --> 00:05:57.329
Personally, I was glad

141
00:05:57.329 --> 00:05:58.338
because it wasn't in the previous one

142
00:05:58.338 --> 00:06:00.588
The difference from AirPods Pro is

143
00:06:00.588 --> 00:06:03.738
that AirPods Pro have the recognition part at the front

144
00:06:03.738 --> 00:06:07.030
while Buds 3 Pro have the recognition part at the back

145
00:06:07.030 --> 00:06:08.999
I got it a little mixed up at first

146
00:06:08.999 --> 00:06:10.020
but I got used to it quickly

147
00:06:10.020 --> 00:06:12.650
There's a saying that humans are animals of adaptation

148
00:06:12.650 --> 00:06:15.169
The method of use is almost the same as AirPods Pro

149
00:06:15.169 --> 00:06:16.499
but if you press it for about 3 seconds

150
00:06:16.499 --> 00:06:18.999
the noise cancellation function or allow ambient sound mode is activated

151
00:06:18.999 --> 00:06:21.659
If you press it once, you can play and end the call

152
00:06:21.659 --> 00:06:24.080
If you press it twice quickly, you can play the next song

153
00:06:24.080 --> 00:06:27.030
If you press it three times, you can play the previous song

154
00:06:27.030 --> 00:06:29.600
You can adjust the volume with a swipe

155
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:32.970
If you rub it upward, the volume goes up

156
00:06:32.970 --> 00:06:35.949
If you rub it downward, the volume goes down

157
00:06:35.949 --> 00:06:38.399
Next, we're going to talk about the most important thing in earphones

158
00:06:38.399 --> 00:06:40.289
Sound quality

159
00:06:40.289 --> 00:06:41.690
Looking at the overall evaluation

160
00:06:41.690 --> 00:06:43.978
There were a lot of comments that the sound quality improved

161
00:06:43.978 --> 00:06:45.198
so I was looking forward to it

162
00:06:45.198 --> 00:06:48.269
In fact, the specifications of the driver and codec are almost the same

163
00:06:48.269 --> 00:06:50.508
So 'could I feel that?' was what I wondered

164
00:06:50.508 --> 00:06:52.388
But personally

165
00:06:52.388 --> 00:06:54.899
the high and low notes are well balanced

166
00:06:54.899 --> 00:06:55.961
Should I say it's better to listen

167
00:06:55.961 --> 00:06:57.519
 in general?

168
00:06:57.519 --> 00:06:59.459
It's the same as the previous one

169
00:06:59.459 --> 00:07:02.878
In terms of having a SSC codec and a 2-way speaker

170
00:07:02.878 --> 00:07:06.608
But they changed the tweeter from dynamic to flat type

171
00:07:06.608 --> 00:07:08.679
Buds' high notes

172
00:07:08.679 --> 00:07:10.218
which was a chronic problem

173
00:07:10.218 --> 00:07:11.510
have improved a lot

174
00:07:11.510 --> 00:07:13.326
In addition, the reinforced woofer creates

175
00:07:13.326 --> 00:07:16.368
 a heavy bass and space

176
00:07:16.368 --> 00:07:19.628
so I felt like it was approaching a much more popular sound quality

177
00:07:19.628 --> 00:07:21.490
I tend to listen to a variety of songs

178
00:07:21.490 --> 00:07:24.210
that I want to listen to depending on my mood or situation

179
00:07:24.210 --> 00:07:27.970
Rock, EDM, hip hop, ballad, classical, idol music, etc.

180
00:07:27.970 --> 00:07:30.680
I listened to the top songs in the charts by category

181
00:07:30.680 --> 00:07:33.279
When I listened to the songs that emphasized the bass

182
00:07:33.279 --> 00:07:37.289
those bass rhythm sounded strong and soft

183
00:07:37.289 --> 00:07:39.399
and I felt the space

184
00:07:39.399 --> 00:07:41.379
I listened to a live version of a concert

185
00:07:41.379 --> 00:07:43.709
and I liked it because it felt so real

186
00:07:43.709 --> 00:07:46.258
Of course, it was good with ballad songs with high notes

187
00:07:46.258 --> 00:07:48.949
and classical instruments with strings

188
00:07:48.949 --> 00:07:51.429
I was able to comfortably listen to songs that have a bouncy electronic sound

189
00:07:51.429 --> 00:07:54.979
 like "How Sweet" by NewJeans, a song that I like

190
00:07:54.979 --> 00:07:58.018
Of course, it's not a high-end sound quality

191
00:07:58.018 --> 00:07:58.798
This sound quality

192
00:07:58.798 --> 00:08:01.618
I think it's enough to name it a 'pro' model

193
00:08:01.618 --> 00:08:03.738
And as they released Buds 3 Pro

194
00:08:03.738 --> 00:08:06.000
it became possible to set up user EQ

195
00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:09.200
The frequency band increased from 6 to 9

196
00:08:09.200 --> 00:08:10.770
so detailed settings are possible

197
00:08:10.770 --> 00:08:12.179
There's definitely a difference

198
00:08:12.179 --> 00:08:13.650
after touching it here and there

199
00:08:13.650 --> 00:08:14.670
but there's a saying

200
00:08:14.670 --> 00:08:16.810
What's the best result of tuning? The basic!

201
00:08:16.810 --> 00:08:18.659
I set it to default

202
00:08:18.659 --> 00:08:22.040
I'm not diligent enough to change the EQ settings every time

203
00:08:22.040 --> 00:08:23.708
Noise canceling is not an upgrade

204
00:08:23.708 --> 00:08:26.799
But more of a lower low-pitch sound blocking and higher mid-pitch sound blocking

205
00:08:26.799 --> 00:08:28.709
It felt like a side-grade

206
00:08:28.709 --> 00:08:30.198
After using it for a month

207
00:08:30.198 --> 00:08:32.878
It's good at canceling sound level of human speech

208
00:08:32.878 --> 00:08:34.729
The low notes like the sound of the subway

209
00:08:34.729 --> 00:08:36.709
or high-pitch sound insulation for alarms or such

210
00:08:36.709 --> 00:08:38.470
There's not much difference from the previous one

211
00:08:38.470 --> 00:08:39.558
When I turned on noise canceling

212
00:08:39.558 --> 00:08:42.360
It doesn't feel tight because my ears are clogged

213
00:08:42.360 --> 00:08:45.649
I thought it would be okay for those who are sensitive to ear inflammation

214
00:08:45.649 --> 00:08:47.790
You all know that noise canceling is also a matter of taste, right?

215
00:08:47.790 --> 00:08:49.678
You can also set the strength of the noise canceling

216
00:08:49.678 --> 00:08:53.320
Based on the strongest level of 5, there's up to level 1

217
00:08:53.320 --> 00:08:56.250
The difference feels the greatest when you go down from level 5 to level 4

218
00:08:56.250 --> 00:08:59.008
I didn't feel much different from below that

219
00:08:59.008 --> 00:09:01.499
I like it when the sound insulation is the best

220
00:09:01.499 --> 00:09:04.030
I don't think I'll use it below level 5

221
00:09:04.030 --> 00:09:06.008
Listen to the surrounding sounds while I'm on noise canceling

222
00:09:06.008 --> 00:09:08.318
I've used the automatic switching function

223
00:09:08.318 --> 00:09:10.849
I can choose siren detection and conversation detection

224
00:09:10.849 --> 00:09:13.229
Siren detection is about dealing with accidents

225
00:09:13.229 --> 00:09:15.130
I thought it was a great feature

226
00:09:15.130 --> 00:09:18.470
Conversation detection turned noise canceling off to simple replies and even to small sounds

227
00:09:18.470 --> 00:09:20.959
There was a bit of delay for it to turn back on

228
00:09:20.959 --> 00:09:23.399
It's convenient but I think it's also not

229
00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:24.418
It feels like a white elephant?

230
00:09:24.418 --> 00:09:26.929
So I'm only using siren detection

231
00:09:26.929 --> 00:09:29.139
The surrounding sound allowance isn't bad

232
00:09:29.139 --> 00:09:30.709
But like a pop filter

233
00:09:30.709 --> 00:09:33.829
It felt like the sound was coming out after filtering out once

234
00:09:33.829 --> 00:09:37.519
Personally, I thought it wasn't as natural as AirPods

235
00:09:37.519 --> 00:09:39.108
It's called adaptive noise canceling

236
00:09:39.108 --> 00:09:40.509
The noise control optimization is

237
00:09:40.509 --> 00:09:42.248
It's not like the sound insulation is good

238
00:09:42.248 --> 00:09:44.449
But you can't hear the surrounding sound well

239
00:09:44.449 --> 00:09:45.839
It felt weird

240
00:09:45.839 --> 00:09:48.178
When I was organizing something at a cafe

241
00:09:48.178 --> 00:09:50.138
I turned on the noise control optimization

242
00:09:50.138 --> 00:09:52.737
It felt like I couldn't block the sound around me at all

243
00:09:52.737 --> 00:09:56.278
It's not loud, but annoying sounds like turning pages of books over

244
00:09:56.278 --> 00:09:59.480
I heard the vibrating bell and the sound of going up and down the stairs

245
00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:02.919
It only turned on when there's a loud noise like the subway

246
00:10:02.919 --> 00:10:05.348
It didn't notice how noisy the environment is

247
00:10:05.348 --> 00:10:07.289
I felt like it didn't recognize it well

248
00:10:07.289 --> 00:10:08.593
Overall

249
00:10:08.593 --> 00:10:10.799
I definitely liked AirPods better for noise canceling

250
00:10:10.799 --> 00:10:14.618
I felt that Buds definitely has merit when it comes to sound quality

251
00:10:14.618 --> 00:10:16.619
How did you all feel about it?

252
00:10:16.619 --> 00:10:18.880
Please leave a comment about the sound quality

253
00:10:18.880 --> 00:10:22.010
The thing that has always been lacking with the Buds compared to the AirPods is

254
00:10:22.010 --> 00:10:23.409
The call quality, right?

255
00:10:23.409 --> 00:10:26.279
There was even people saying that this is due to the limitations of earphone design itself

256
00:10:26.279 --> 00:10:29.320
But this time, the design has changed to be more like the AirPods, right?

257
00:10:29.320 --> 00:10:30.840
Seeing the stem-shaped design

258
00:10:30.840 --> 00:10:34.209
Oh? I wondered if the call quality might have improved this time

259
00:10:34.209 --> 00:10:34.990
It has improved!

260
00:10:34.990 --> 00:10:36.878
I'll let you listen to the test I did right away

261
00:10:36.878 --> 00:10:40.450
Great job to all the athletes from South Korea

262
00:10:40.450 --> 00:10:43.788
Great job to all the athletes from South Korea

263
00:10:43.788 --> 00:10:47.250
Great job to all the athletes from South Korea

264
00:10:47.250 --> 00:10:49.090
Even in the subway or busy areas

265
00:10:49.090 --> 00:10:51.059
Background noise is almost completely blocked out

266
00:10:51.059 --> 00:10:52.599
Usually, when making calls on the subway

267
00:10:52.599 --> 00:10:55.230
My friends used to say they could hear the station name

268
00:10:55.230 --> 00:10:57.110
This time, they couldn't tell where I was

269
00:10:57.110 --> 00:11:00.858
Of course, there were also comments that sometimes my voice sounded robotic during calls

270
00:11:00.858 --> 00:11:02.157
If the surroundings are too noisy

271
00:11:02.157 --> 00:11:05.280
Sometimes, my voice can get drowned out by the surrounding noise

272
00:11:05.280 --> 00:11:07.079
Still, this time, compared to the AirPods

273
00:11:07.079 --> 00:11:09.008
The comment of call quality being worse

274
00:11:09.008 --> 00:11:10.629
I think it has somewhat overturned that assessment

275
00:11:10.629 --> 00:11:13.348
Finally, let me tell you about the new features that have been added

276
00:11:13.348 --> 00:11:15.989
It's the AI voice recognition translation feature

277
00:11:15.989 --> 00:11:17.149
It's a fascinating feature

278
00:11:17.149 --> 00:11:18.810
To explain how to use it

279
00:11:18.810 --> 00:11:20.318
While wearing the product

280
00:11:20.318 --> 00:11:23.139
Access the translation feature through the quick menu on the top bar

281
00:11:23.139 --> 00:11:27.428
Next to the clock icon in the top right corner, you'll see an icon that looks like a folder

282
00:11:27.428 --> 00:11:31.049
When you press it, what the other person is saying will appear on the cover screen as well

283
00:11:31.049 --> 00:11:34.479
After pressing the microphone button on the left and listening to the other person’s speech

284
00:11:34.479 --> 00:11:37.289
You can hear the translated content directly through the Buds

285
00:11:37.289 --> 00:11:41.469
Once the translation of the other person's speech is finished, it automatically records what I'm saying

286
00:11:41.469 --> 00:11:44.939
The translated content is displayed on the cover screen and played through the speaker

287
00:11:44.939 --> 00:11:49.040
Although there is a slight delay, it didn't make the communication inconvenient

288
00:11:49.040 --> 00:11:52.729
But so far, there is still something about having a conversation with the other person that feels

289
00:11:52.729 --> 00:11:55.110
a bit awkward because I am wearing something in my ear

290
00:11:55.110 --> 00:11:57.798
It feels a bit impolite

291
00:11:57.798 --> 00:11:59.690
I am a K-adult

292
00:11:59.690 --> 00:12:02.578
So, after actually using it, I found that it’s not really for conversations but rather for

293
00:12:02.578 --> 00:12:05.719
conferences or meetings abroad

294
00:12:05.719 --> 00:12:08.788
But don’t we usually get asked to remove our earbuds during lectures?

295
00:12:08.788 --> 00:12:11.460
Although it translates in real time and provides accurate results

296
00:12:11.460 --> 00:12:13.949
There were some errors in the transcription itself

297
00:12:13.949 --> 00:12:15.188
And there is some delay

298
00:12:15.188 --> 00:12:17.709
So it can be a bit inconvenient to just wait

299
00:12:17.709 --> 00:12:20.400
It seems that it's still premature for practical use

300
00:12:20.400 --> 00:12:23.839
Aside from that, if you say commands like ‘Turn up the volume’ or ‘Next song,’

301
00:12:23.839 --> 00:12:26.379
There was a function to understand and execute it

302
00:12:26.379 --> 00:12:28.928
I didn't want to use this function

303
00:12:28.928 --> 00:12:31.019
because I used earphones when people were around

304
00:12:31.019 --> 00:12:32.108
What if the person next to you

305
00:12:32.108 --> 00:12:34.169
answers like "Sorry?", "What was that?"

306
00:12:34.169 --> 00:12:35.969
But it's hard to use your hands

307
00:12:35.969 --> 00:12:39.559
if you cook often or if you run early in the morning

308
00:12:39.559 --> 00:12:41.688
You don't need to call Bixby to use this feature

309
00:12:41.688 --> 00:12:43.559
so I think it'll be useful for those people

310
00:12:46.960 --> 00:12:49.962
It's a product that I've been looking forward to the most

311
00:12:49.962 --> 00:12:52.130
among the new Galaxy products including Galaxy ring

312
00:12:52.130 --> 00:12:55.040
I was worried about the QC issue

313
00:12:55.040 --> 00:12:57.039
But overall, I was satisfied

314
00:12:57.039 --> 00:12:58.759
As long as it's not defective

315
00:12:58.759 --> 00:13:02.159
the sound quality and the call quality have improved a lot

316
00:13:02.159 --> 00:13:03.917
Personally

317
00:13:03.917 --> 00:13:05.320
 I think it's a good choice

318
00:13:05.320 --> 00:13:07.239
to change the design to a stem style

319
00:13:07.239 --> 00:13:08.959
Of course, as I said at first

320
00:13:08.959 --> 00:13:11.839
the price is still a bit burdensome

321
00:13:11.839 --> 00:13:15.200
I think it'll be okay if it goes down to around the lower KRW 200,000 range

322
00:13:15.200 --> 00:13:17.259
That's it for today's video

323
00:13:17.259 --> 00:13:18.980
If you have any more questions about the product

324
00:13:18.980 --> 00:13:20.589
Please leave them in the comments

325
00:13:20.589 --> 00:13:22.400
See you in the next video

326
00:13:22.400 --> 00:13:23.861
Bye

327
00:13:24.548 --> 00:13:28.898
Subscribe
EP Avi / Planning Shootdori / Editing Shortening