0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.024
The best rival! Galaxy vs Iphone

1
00:00:03.024 --> 00:00:07.272
Finally Galaxy S23 has been released with the attention of many people

2
00:00:07.272 --> 00:00:10.320
It was so popular with more than 1,000,000 pre-orders

3
00:00:10.320 --> 00:00:14.319
It's 70000 more than the previous S22 model

4
00:00:14.319 --> 00:00:18.767
Out of that the most popular Ultra model consists about 60% of the pre-orders

5
00:00:18.767 --> 00:00:21.615
And the one and only Galaxy’s rival: Iphone

6
00:00:21.615 --> 00:00:24.464
Even though it was released before Galaxy, its still very popular

7
00:00:24.464 --> 00:00:28.862
Even though its becoming increasingly expensive and without much additional benefits, its always high in demand

8
00:00:28.862 --> 00:00:32.610
And with the news of the release of iphone 15 and iphone ultra 

9
00:00:32.610 --> 00:00:33.960
it's once more getting much attention

10
00:00:33.960 --> 00:00:37.608
Every time there is a release of new series, Galaxy and iphone are always competing to hit the new record

11
00:00:37.608 --> 00:00:42.756
So now we'll be comparing the most popular models

12
00:00:42.756 --> 00:00:44.755
(Galaxy S23 Ultra vs iPhone 14 pro max)
Today’s products

13
00:00:44.755 --> 00:00:47.054
(Performance, speed, heating rate, camera, sound quality, speaker, battery life)
Today’s tests

14
00:00:47.054 --> 00:00:49.153
Today’s Gwanganli’s personal products~!

15
00:00:49.153 --> 00:00:50.952
Subscribe and like our channel!

16
00:00:50.952 --> 00:00:52.402
But first, appearance comparison

17
00:00:52.402 --> 00:00:54.900
First up is the Galaxy S23 Ultra

18
00:00:54.900 --> 00:00:58.399
There are 4 colors: basic green, phantom black, lavender and cream

19
00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:00.998
(Lime, sky blue, graphite, and red)
There are an additional of unique 4 colors for Samsung's official websites 

20
00:01:00.998 --> 00:01:03.497
Total weight including the pen is approx. 236g

21
00:01:03.497 --> 00:01:05.946
and excluding the pen is approx. 233g

22
00:01:05.946 --> 00:01:09.644
(display screen is 6.8inch)
Horizontally 16.3cm and vertically 7.8cm

23
00:01:09.644 --> 00:01:11.643
This is what it looks like when held by Gawnganli guy and girl

24
00:01:11.643 --> 00:01:14.493
The system is android 13 with 12GB of memory

25
00:01:14.493 --> 00:01:16.791
Processor is snap dragon 8 gen 2

26
00:01:16.791 --> 00:01:20.589
The back camera is 2million pixels, 10000k pixel with 3 times and 10 times zoom

27
00:01:20.589 --> 00:01:23.588
The signature of Ultra model is the S Pen

28
00:01:23.588 --> 00:01:26.037
And there is a feature samsung dex to use is like a PC

29
00:01:26.037 --> 00:01:29.635
Ultra 512GB when it was released was 1,700,000 Won (1300USD)

30
00:01:29.635 --> 00:01:31.784
Next is iphone 14 pro max

31
00:01:31.784 --> 00:01:34.933
The colors come in deep purple, gold, silver, space black

32
00:01:34.933 --> 00:01:37.531
Pro max weighs 252g

33
00:01:37.531 --> 00:01:41.180
(display screen is 6.7inch)
Horizontally 16cm and vertically 7.7cm

34
00:01:41.180 --> 00:01:43.379
And this is what it looks like held by Gawnganli guy and girl

35
00:01:43.379 --> 00:01:48.027
The system is ios16, memory 6GB  with processor A16 bionic

36
00:01:48.027 --> 00:01:52.725
The back camera has 4800k pixels, 1200k ultra wide 3 times zoom

37
00:01:52.725 --> 00:01:56.973
Various algorithms detect collision and has emergency help function

38
00:01:56.973 --> 00:02:00.471
Pro max 512GB released with 2,000,000won (1530usd)

39
00:02:00.471 --> 00:02:03.770
Before we get into the testing we will compare all the specs together

40
00:02:03.770 --> 00:02:05.769
The memory is 12GB and 6GB respectively

41
00:02:05.769 --> 00:02:08.468
besides 128GB iphone the saving space is the same

42
00:02:08.468 --> 00:02:11.116
the processor is the best for both brands

43
00:02:11.116 --> 00:02:13.915
Camera was a big deal for galaxy’s 2million pixels

44
00:02:13.915 --> 00:02:15.814
iphone continued to have 1200k pixels

45
00:02:15.814 --> 00:02:19.163
but recently in 14 series it upgraded to 4800k pixels

46
00:02:19.163 --> 00:02:23.011
the display is 6.8inch and 6.7inch respectively which is similar

47
00:02:23.011 --> 00:02:24.111
Performance test

48
00:02:24.111 --> 00:02:28.059
Most importantly we will look at the CPU/GPU rate

49
00:02:28.059 --> 00:02:31.008
We will use geekbench to look at the CPU

50
00:02:31.008 --> 00:02:35.156
First Galaxy is single-core 2011, multi-core 5222

51
00:02:35.156 --> 00:02:39.004
iPhone is single-core 2524, multi-core 6476

52
00:02:39.004 --> 00:02:40.853
And let’s check out the GPU

53
00:02:40.853 --> 00:02:43.202
It’s the result of Galaxy S23

54
00:02:43.202 --> 00:02:45.301
Next it’s the result of iPhone 14 Pro Max

55
00:02:45.301 --> 00:02:50.949
iPhone had higher CPU, both had similar GPU retentivity but Galaxy had a higher value

56
00:02:50.949 --> 00:02:54.297
(CPU - iPhone / GPU - Galaxy)
They each took one in the performance test

57
00:02:54.297 --> 00:02:55.247
Speed test

58
00:02:55.247 --> 00:03:00.344
Now I’ll do various speed tests and find out which one has higher speed

59
00:03:00.344 --> 00:03:02.144
First let’s look at the power booting

60
00:03:02.144 --> 00:03:05.142
I’ll turn them off and turn them on at the same time

61
00:03:05.142 --> 00:03:08.741
iPhone was turned on first and then Galaxy was turned on

62
00:03:08.741 --> 00:03:10.340
Next I’ll go into a portal site

63
00:03:10.340 --> 00:03:13.788
iPhone was slightly faster and immediately after that Galaxy worked

64
00:03:13.788 --> 00:03:17.337
Now it’s the store, Galaxy was faster by a hair’s breadth

65
00:03:17.337 --> 00:03:20.435
Now it’s YouTube, iPhone was slightly faster

66
00:03:20.435 --> 00:03:24.384
Next I’ll turn on the music app, for the music app Galaxy was faster

67
00:03:24.384 --> 00:03:28.532
Next I’ll go into an OTT, for OTT Galaxy was faster

68
00:03:28.532 --> 00:03:32.630
Next it’s shopping app, Galaxy worked first and then iPhone worked

69
00:03:32.630 --> 00:03:36.628
Lastly it’s game, iPhone was slightly faster for game

70
00:03:36.628 --> 00:03:39.427
Additionally, I’ll check out the scanning rate of each product

71
00:03:39.427 --> 00:03:43.325
It was a delicate difference but Galaxy feels to work more smoothly

72
00:03:43.325 --> 00:03:45.374
I’ll check out the video rendering this time

73
00:03:45.374 --> 00:03:47.773
I’ll work with the same video and extract it

74
00:03:47.773 --> 00:03:52.171
I’ll apply the same effect on a 720p video and extract them at the same time

75
00:03:52.171 --> 00:03:56.020
After rendering started, Galaxy was faster at first

76
00:03:56.020 --> 00:03:58.918
But at the last stage, iPhone was completed first

77
00:03:58.918 --> 00:04:03.966
Next I’ll apply the same effect on a 1080p video and extract them at the same time

78
00:04:03.966 --> 00:04:08.714
Rendering was done at the same time and Galaxy was faster for this video

79
00:04:08.714 --> 00:04:13.412
Lastly, I’ll apply the same effect on a 4K video and look at the rendering speed

80
00:04:13.412 --> 00:04:17.760
When rendering was done at the same time, Galaxy was slightly faster

81
00:04:17.760 --> 00:04:21.158
To recap, iPhone had a faster power booting speed

82
00:04:21.158 --> 00:04:25.307
For app launching, the speed of the two products was similar for six apps

83
00:04:25.307 --> 00:04:29.705
And scanning rate was similar but Galaxy worked more smoothly

84
00:04:29.705 --> 00:04:32.903
Galaxy had a faster video rendering speed

85
00:04:32.903 --> 00:04:36.002
The two products both had similar speed for the speed test

86
00:04:36.002 --> 00:04:37.201
Heating test

87
00:04:37.201 --> 00:04:39.950
I’ll look at the heating of each product

88
00:04:39.950 --> 00:04:43.249
I’ll play a game and watch a video for 30 minutes with each product

89
00:04:43.249 --> 00:04:46.847
After using it for an hour, I’ll find the product that heated less

90
00:04:46.847 --> 00:04:49.496
First I’ll activate a game for 30 minutes

91
00:04:49.496 --> 00:04:53.244
Next I’ll watch the same video for 30 minutes

92
00:04:53.244 --> 00:04:57.042
After using for an hour, I’ll check them with a thermal imaging camera

93
00:04:57.042 --> 00:05:00.941
On the thermal image, they look similar with no big difference

94
00:05:00.941 --> 00:05:02.590
I’ll measure the temperature

95
00:05:02.590 --> 00:05:05.189
The rear temperature of Galaxy is approximately 33 degrees C

96
00:05:05.189 --> 00:05:08.237
The rear temperature of iPhone is approximately 29.1 degrees C

97
00:05:08.237 --> 00:05:11.186
iPhone was less heated in this heat test

98
00:05:11.186 --> 00:05:12.186
Camera test

99
00:05:12.186 --> 00:05:15.184
Now I’ll check out the camera performance of each product

100
00:05:15.184 --> 00:05:19.033
We’re going to put both products in the same setting and start shooting

101
00:05:19.033 --> 00:05:21.082
First, we’ll shoot a regular object

102
00:05:21.082 --> 00:05:25.080
The Galaxy is brighter, and the iPhone photo is clearer

103
00:05:25.080 --> 00:05:27.679
This time, we will compare how both products work on letters written on paper

104
00:05:27.679 --> 00:05:30.477
I think the Galaxy came out brighter this time too

105
00:05:30.477 --> 00:05:32.277
Next, we will take a portrait photo

106
00:05:32.277 --> 00:05:35.375
In the case of portraits, the iPhone was brighter

107
00:05:35.375 --> 00:05:37.074
This time, we’re shooting outdoors

108
00:05:37.074 --> 00:05:39.473
Galaxy is a bit brighter this time, too

109
00:05:39.473 --> 00:05:42.972
The iPhone photo was similar to that of the naked eye

110
00:05:42.972 --> 00:05:46.720
The iPhone is able to clearly capture objects with a darker color

111
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:49.469
In this case, the photo taken by the Galaxy is brighter,

112
00:05:49.469 --> 00:05:52.468
But the iPhone better captures the details of the object

113
00:05:52.468 --> 00:05:55.116
Next, we will look into how each phones perform on pictures taken with 3x zoom

114
00:05:55.116 --> 00:05:57.665
First, the Galaxy on 3x zoom

115
00:05:57.665 --> 00:06:00.814
The building sign is quite clear on the photo

116
00:06:00.814 --> 00:06:03.863
Next we will look into iPhone’s 3x zoom

117
00:06:03.863 --> 00:06:07.611
Due to the light glare from the sign, the photo is harder to read

118
00:06:07.611 --> 00:06:10.010
Next, we will try shooting in a dark environment

119
00:06:10.010 --> 00:06:13.008
We will compare the results with both phones on the same settings

120
00:06:13.008 --> 00:06:16.607
The Galaxy tends to be hazy but generally brighter

121
00:06:16.607 --> 00:06:19.905
The iPhone photo is clearer but the area around the object came out bright

122
00:06:19.905 --> 00:06:22.854
Next we will move on to test the image stabilization of both phones

123
00:06:22.854 --> 00:06:25.953
Both the Galaxy and the iPhone were on the same settings

124
00:06:25.953 --> 00:06:30.201
In the case of the Galaxy, the cars on either side of the road are filmed clearly and the image stabilization seems to be effective

125
00:06:30.201 --> 00:06:36.198
For the iPhone, it effectively corrects most vibrations but is a little lacking on the details of the object

126
00:06:36.198 --> 00:06:37.497
Let’s examine the results

127
00:06:37.497 --> 00:06:43.045
When filming objects and written letters indoors, the Galaxy tended to be brighter

128
00:06:43.045 --> 00:06:44.644
whereas for portrait pictures the iPhone was brighter

129
00:06:44.644 --> 00:06:48.593
When in a setting with lights outdoors, the Galaxy was a bit brighter than the iPhone

130
00:06:48.593 --> 00:06:52.891
but in darker colored objects the iPhone photos were more vivid and bright

131
00:06:52.891 --> 00:06:57.039
In the case of photos taken with 3x zoom, the iPhone was brighter but was blurry

132
00:06:57.039 --> 00:07:01.137
The Galaxy photo was darker but with less glare from the light

133
00:07:01.137 --> 00:07:05.235
In a dark environment both products produced bright photos

134
00:07:05.235 --> 00:07:07.334
But the iPhone depicted the object in more detail

135
00:07:07.334 --> 00:07:11.232
The Galaxy was more effective in terms of image stabilization 

136
00:07:11.232 --> 00:07:15.530
(Although it may be up to personal preference) As a result of the camera tests, the Galaxy proved to be a little bit better 

137
00:07:15.530 --> 00:07:16.980
The Voice Assistant test 

138
00:07:16.980 --> 00:07:21.278
(Bixby VS Siri)
We will also test the Voice Assistant which people often use

139
00:07:21.278 --> 00:07:23.477
Set an alarm for two hours

140
00:07:26.676 --> 00:07:30.174
For simple commands like setting the alarm both products made the cut

141
00:07:30.174 --> 00:07:32.523
What day is Children’s Day next year?

142
00:07:35.072 --> 00:07:38.170
The Galaxy misheard next year as every year

143
00:07:38.170 --> 00:07:39.820
(Fail / Success)

144
00:07:39.820 --> 00:07:41.669
How many holidays do we have next year?

145
00:07:43.718 --> 00:07:47.316
On the third question, Galaxy provided us with the specific number

146
00:07:47.316 --> 00:07:49.415
and the iPhone gave us the search results 

147
00:07:49.415 --> 00:07:52.214
Tell me the route from Seoul to Busan

148
00:07:56.512 --> 00:07:59.939
This time upon asking directions, Galaxy provided us with (additional) options

149
00:07:59.939 --> 00:08:02.060
and the iPhone gave directions right away

150
00:08:02.060 --> 00:08:04.709
Tell me today’s fine dust concentration

151
00:08:09.506 --> 00:08:14.304
For fine dust concentration, Galaxy answered well but iPhone needed an additional search

152
00:08:14.304 --> 00:08:16.403
Tell me the nearest convenience store

153
00:08:18.402 --> 00:08:21.901
For the last question, iPhone answered well at once

154
00:08:21.901 --> 00:08:24.200
Galaxy had additional options

155
00:08:24.200 --> 00:08:27.598
iPhone had a more accurate voice assistant

156
00:08:27.598 --> 00:08:28.798
Speaker test

157
00:08:28.798 --> 00:08:30.647
The next test is the speaker

158
00:08:30.647 --> 00:08:35.595
I’ll look for the product with higher decibel when prepared music was turned on at full blast

159
00:08:35.595 --> 00:08:37.494
First it’s Galaxy

160
00:08:37.494 --> 00:08:41.442
I’ll measure at a distance of about 10cm from the product

161
00:08:48.289 --> 00:08:50.738
It’s about 95.9dB for Galaxy

162
00:08:50.738 --> 00:08:54.336
Next it’s iPhone, I’ll measure at the same position

163
00:09:01.333 --> 00:09:04.132
It’s about 95.5dB for iPhone

164
00:09:04.132 --> 00:09:07.481
With a little difference, Galaxy had a higher decibel

165
00:09:07.481 --> 00:09:08.480
Charging test

166
00:09:08.480 --> 00:09:12.628
Before starting the test, I fully charged both products to 100%

167
00:09:12.628 --> 00:09:18.076
After all the tests were done, Galaxy had 51% remaining battery and iPhone has 60%

168
00:09:18.076 --> 00:09:21.674
Now I’ll charge both products with the same charger at the same time

169
00:09:21.674 --> 00:09:26.722
Connect and start charging at the same time! I’ll charge for only 10 minutes

170
00:09:26.722 --> 00:09:31.020
After 10 minutes, I’ll check how much was charged

171
00:09:31.020 --> 00:09:36.717
First, Galaxy was charged about 18% in 10 minutes from 51% to 69%

172
00:09:36.717 --> 00:09:41.815
iPhone was charged about 8% in 10 minutes from 60% to 68%

173
00:09:41.815 --> 00:09:43.215
(Galaxy VS iPhone final results)

174
00:09:43.215 --> 00:09:48.362
We did seven tests here at Gawnganli and I’ll do a recap of each of the result

175
00:09:48.362 --> 00:09:52.211
At performance test, iPhone has higher CPU and Galaxy had higher GPU

176
00:09:52.211 --> 00:09:55.259
Next for speed test, iPhone had higher power booting speed

177
00:09:55.259 --> 00:09:57.508
Both products had similar app launching speed

178
00:09:57.508 --> 00:10:01.306
And for heating test, after being used for an hour by game and video

179
00:10:01.306 --> 00:10:03.555
iPhone was less heated

180
00:10:03.555 --> 00:10:06.454
For camera test, there would be differences in tastes and preferences

181
00:10:06.454 --> 00:10:10.352
But Galaxy had brighter photos overall and iPhone had clear photos

182
00:10:10.352 --> 00:10:14.251
But for prevention of hand tremor, Galaxy prevented the tremor better

183
00:10:14.251 --> 00:10:17.649
For voice assistants, iPhone had clearer answers

184
00:10:17.649 --> 00:10:20.898
For speaker performances, Galaxy had a higher decibel with a very small difference

185
00:10:20.898 --> 00:10:24.496
When charged for 10 minutes, Galaxy charged more

186
00:10:24.796 --> 00:10:28.444
(Subscribe & Like)
Real Review With No Ads Gawnganli! 
See you next time